Browsed by
Category: terrorism

UK proposals to monitor all electronic communications

UK proposals to monitor all electronic communications

The UK seems to have this mentality that it’s OK as long as it’s happening to someone else.

Read on..

Internet service providers are to be invited to tender for a government scheme to monitor all internet communications and telecommunications.

Under the proposed Interception Modernisation Programme (IMP), internet service providers (ISPs) would be required to link ‘black boxes’ to their servers to record all internet traffic, including details of emails, VoIP telephone conversations, instant messages and browsing habits. Telephone conversations would also be monitored.

The traffic data would then be siphoned into a centralised database, enabling the government to monitor all business and domestic internet and telephone communications. According to insiders, some ISPs have already been pitching to the Home Office to provide the ‘black boxes’ to record the data.

The Home Office and GCHQ have applied to central government for funding for the scheme. Answering a written question posed by Lord Northesk last month, Admiral West, the parliamentary undersecretary of state for security and an adviser to Gordon Brown, gave details of the funding request last week.

stalin-big-brother According to West, as part of the 2007 Comprehensive Spending Review (CSR), “a central bid was made to HM Treasury on behalf of the security and intelligence agencies. Funding for IMP was included in the bid, and the exact programme allocation across the CSR years is currently being finalised between the Home Office and HM Treasury.”

Funding would be for three years. University of Cambridge security expert Richard Clayton told ZDNet.co.uk that putting state-of-the-art surveillance devices into all UK ISPs would be “likely to cost quite a lot”. As a consequence, Clayton said the government plans to deploy the system at one ISP initially.

West confirmed that the government would be conducting a “feasibility study” for the surveillance of ISPs and for the centralised communications database, up to 2010.

“A significant proportion of the programme investment over the Comprehensive Spending Review period will be used to test feasibility and reduce the risk associated with implementing the proposed IMP solution,” said West. “The private sector is likely to play a major role in this work and the programme will be conducting a competitive tender and entering commercial negotiations to commission its services.”

However, peers criticised the government proposals. Lord Errol of Hay told ZDNet.co.uk on Tuesday that the proposals were “incredibly dangerous”.

“Part of the problem is that the Home Office would be able to self-authorise to do any searches in the database, which is very dangerous indeed,” said Errol. “At the moment, someone checks the access requests.”

Clayton agreed with Errol that the proposals were “completely not proportionate”. “If the government is going to do this, it would be far better to force all mosques, churches, and public houses to fit microphones and tape recorders,” he told ZDNet.co.uk. “East Germany used to have a comparable system.”

At present, surveillance information can be requested from ISPs by law-enforcement agencies, but those requests can be queried by the ISPs concerned. According to Clayton, a centralised database without such a check may contravene existing data-protection legislation, so the government would need to change the law to make the database legal.

“At the moment, the centralised database and self-authorisation would be illegal under the Data Protection Act,” said Clayton. “The draft Communications Data Bill will contain clauses to make this legal.”

Lord Errol agreed that the only reason to bring the Communications Data Bill in as primary, rather than secondary, legislation would be to legalise the government plans — secondary legislation would have to conform to existing data-protection laws.

“The Communications Data Bill has to be producing something new — the Home Office is going after some new powers,” said Errol. “They have all of the powers they want, except for being able to bring all of the data together at the Home Office.”

The Home Office on Tuesday confirmed that it was seeking to introduce a centralised database of communications data, but said the plans were at the proposal stage.

“The changes to the way we communicate, due particularly to the internet revolution, will increasingly undermine our current capabilities to obtain communications data — essential for counter-terrorism and investigation of crime purpose[s] — and use it to protect the public,” stated a Home Office spokesperson. “Proposals are being developed and full details of the draft Bill will be released later this year, allowing for full engagement with Parliament and the public.”

The Home Office spokesperson admitted that primary legislation would be necessary to legalise a self-authorised, centralised database. “That is why we’re introducing primary legislation,” the spokesperson told ZDNet.co.uk. However, the spokesperson again added that, at present, these are proposals rather than plans.

Privacy watchdog the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) said it had “grave questions about the acceptability of such a scheme”.

“In the fight against evil, we must not ride roughshod over our liberties,” said Richard Thomas in a speech on Tuesday. “Every phone call, email, internet search and online transaction would be monitored. Even the possibility of such a scheme needs the fullest debate before becoming legislation.”

Thomas declined to comment as to whether the Home Office proposals were legal under current data-protection law, and refused to comment any further about his concerns.

The ICO had not been consulted by the Home Office over the communications-database plans, said an ICO insider.

(Visited 1 times, 1 visits today)
Serbia & Kosovo – A new front for the war on terror

Serbia & Kosovo – A new front for the war on terror

Kosovo: 10th December marks the official deadline for sovereignty negotiations to end. For someone that’s visited Kosovo (and Serbia) within the last 3 months, I can bring back the following observations.

a) Kosovo has been invaded by Albanians:
Maybe you need to quantify this statement in wikipedia. As a foreign onlooker, the number of Albanian, not Serbian, flags throughout the territory leads you to believe you’re in Albania, not Serbia.

b) Almost 1/3 of the traffic on the roads is KFOR:
If, like the newspapers are saying, there is a rumbling of radicalism. It stands to be toward the Serbs.
With 45,000 troops stationed there, any attack on Kosovo is likely to be met with stiff resistance and international back-up.

In black and white
Historically pitted with conflict, there are no black and white solutions.
In an attempt to be seen to be ‘doing good’, KFOR’s presence has had the net-effect of setting both Serbia and Kosovo back 7 years, also, giving rise to the growth of criminal cells with close links to terrorism, who have prospered under the troops presence through illegal-goods, prostitution and the supply of drugs.

The politics
Personally, I don’t think the region has any potential for serious conflict, Serbia is too poor and Kosovo has too many troops.

If Kosovo achieves independence, you can expect that within 5-10 years resolutions will make it part of the wider Albanian authority, and eventually becoming part of Albanian territory per-se.

No visits yet
The nature of the beast

The nature of the beast


I’m just trying to be clear about the reasons why people do things:

You have a subject; who you torture. You know the outcome.

You carry on the torture, knowing the outcome.

In order to get to torture the subject in the first place, you tell lies, knowing there’ll never be an outcome.

Welcome home Mike
I am undergoing torture at the moment.
People surrounding my flat, are using weapons, low frequency weapons to keep me awake at night.
I haven’t been to sleep properly for 4 days.

The effects of the weapons is a slight tingling sensation. This is accompanied by a sound like a television or electrical device, barely audible, like background static.
You can hear the devises being turned on and off on the walls in the properties adjacent to mine.
When they are turned on, the tingling starts.
It is possible to sleep if you move away from the devise.

The past number of nights I’ve been moving my bed around. At the moment it’s up against a chest of drawers next to a window.

The spirit of Christmas past
Is this punishment for not signing a contract with Unilever 10 years in my past.

If I’ve done something wrong, shouldn’t the Police arrest me and I be tried?

There’s no reason to torture me. I’m not going to confess to anything.

Nothing’s going to change.
Nothing’s going to happen.

If you believe there’s suddenly going to be a result. You are wrong.

Just thought I’d let you know.

No visits yet
Alan Johnston

Alan Johnston


After the pictures of with the explosives, I saw Alan Johnston being blow to pieces as a monumental chitty to the lawlessness of the west bank.

A would-be coup surely for those seeking to negatively leverage the current precarious situation in the west bank.

Cake & eat it
It’s obvious Johnston had a groundswell of support over there, like the democratically elected Hamas government, he was popular with the people.

Israel and the west are going to have to wait for another excuse to de-stabilize the region further.

(Visited 2 times, 1 visits today)
News Briefing and Chanel 4

News Briefing and Chanel 4


I notice that Channel 4 was the only channel to reject media briefing to lead on the big terrorist story tonight.

Doubtlessly, this will cost them their public-operators license in the long-term.

They led on the Obachiche, video below.
A story about Terrorist’s being sponsored harboured and funded by the UK government.

(Visited 1 times, 1 visits today)